Let’s talk about our bodies natural immunity intelligently, shall we? I stated in a previous article addressing the theme of Emotional Intelligence (EI), EI as something that could be described as reading the mind of a person and understanding exactly why people do what they do. In the age of Covid-19 and multiple SARS case,, the virulent, I’m hopeful proper perspectives would be reflected in our collective EI. However, it doesn’t appear so instead of a superhero effect of intelligently monitoring the clinical trends does in fact appear that we are becoming less intelligent and more emotional under a frenzy of confusion. And, I’m not intentionally diverting from political correctness ladies and gentlemen under these circumstances are civility is at stake! The dividing lines between vaccinated and non vaccinated, natural immunity, and immune compromised vulnerabilities have distinguished roles which are perceived as causation and problematic to the essence of this particular transcript-base germ warfare. It’s time we’ve called upon our skills as EI heroes and become ultimate conflict resolution organizers. Depending on your Emotional Quotient or EQ strength you’d become one among the greats. The character possessing the greatest skills in leadership would contend with the opposition, draw upon their superlative talents as the EI hero and voilà, the mastery would kick in (Trushell, 2004). EI is described as ability “to build relationships” (DuBrin, 2012, p. 481). Although, it would be great to be seen as having superior or super human capabilities as implied by writer John M. Trushell. EI as a pulp fiction does not totally to result in fictitious results, it will help save lives!EI is the motive to engage innate abilities as empathy and trust. Trust, however has to have some degree of disciplined control. Among capable leadership and those who are under the subjection EI can produce amazing collaboration and resolution. EI results in actions performed by and between individuals, groups or organizations making those who take steps to engage “constructive use of … emotion” more effective through their administrative processes (DuBrin, 2012, p.481). Imagine the difference among subordinate members of a group who have two persons to follow. One person is seen among the group as a leader and the other person is seen as an authority figure but, not a leader. The superior individual with the highest level of EI would be described as the person viewed as being aware of the needs of the subordinates. And, the title of leader may apply to anyone among this group possessing the advantage of emotional trust from members of the group. Identifying the second category of highly ranked heroes of administration can be difficult since, they aren’t necessarily specified by managerial appointment they are recognized by the way their peers engage with them.Scores that have been adopted to measure a level of EI such as MSCEIT, its scoring process determines a person’s EI based on a scale identified as a quotient. There are highly questionable methods to these measurements. Measurements that could determine if a person is able to control their anger must take into consideration more than the scope of anger management tools as psychometric assessments as the, HCR-20. Mayer, Salovey, Caruso & Sitarenios, (2003) contend there are concerns regarding the reliability of such tests. They challenge validity of emotional intelligence itself and whether results of tests will provide consistent results. In my own self-examination, I have been evaluated a having “Good EQ”, in theory. I do believe I have some degree of leadership abilities which would support good EQ results. However, I don’t believe my results would replicate if I would take a similar study under slightly different questions or different demands they might indicate some similarity but highly unlikely to be the same. DuBrin (2012) describes this as an ability to connect with people and understand their emotions” (p. 162). Is it truly necessary to connect? I believe having what is described to be emotional intelligence leads to a better understanding of what makes a great leader, better. Connecting to people is essential to administration and leadership even though EI claims are made to imply being first in this regard scientist credit Darwinian ideals as emotional expression as the central token of adaptive leadership traits.